The new AI (Artificial Intelligence) engine behind the simple 'Auto' button offers a great starting point.īut nothing is as useful to me as real Photoshop. LR has become a much more capable editing machine than it was in the past. At $10-ish per month, I could have LR and real Photoshop for what I was paying each year to upgrade to the new Elements. I always ended up buying the 'new Elements' anyway. I for one was delighted when Adobe moved to the CC subscription model. Once you've mastered the power of 'layers' nothing comes close. Where was my point-and-shoot post processing? A light bulb clicked, it became easier, and then it became impossible to go back. I bought one version at something like a $300 upgrade over Elements, before they moved to a monthly subscription model with CC (Creative Cloud). That was about the time when full Photoshop was coming down in price. Whatever it was, I decided to take the plunge and give 'real' Photoshop a try. Probably just an urge to try new things and get a little better. LR made my digital photography workflow so much easier. Managing all those images is a bear of a job. The $100 price tag seemed so much more reasonable vs the hundreds that proper Photoshop cost. 16 bit is important in initial processing setting black and white points and colour balance to avoid banding in smooth gradients like you might get in photo with a smooth gradient from dark through to bright water.ġ6 Bits/Channel Editing in Photoshop Elements - Photoshop Elements 10 Tutorial | The only thing not officially supported is 16 bit editing but there are workarounds, this link goes through what to do. If you don't need the DAM of lightroom, the tools in PS elements will be enough. Make no mistake full PS is an amazing program with a steep learning curve and most people only scratch the surface, but it's also mish-mash of tools and modules slung together which limit its potential and I don't see that being addressed.įor raw conversions I've switched over to Capture One which is a one off purchase. Things that would have been useful like more efficient code and threading to speed up the old tried and true tools or basic must haves like support for 4K monitors in Windows were never provided and even now in CC the old code is still there and 4K support seems to give issues at times. The reason Adobe introduced subscription is revenues were down as people didn't see value in the upgrades and only upgraded when were forced to when their new camera was not supported by ACR. If you're buying now Adobe locks you into a subscription for LR, I have been using photoshop for many years (17 years) including Adobe camera raw but I've stopped with CS6 I don't see any need to give Adobe more money for upgrades of dubious value, even the dehaze filter can emulated in PS with levels and clarity.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |